U.S. Companies Can’t be “For” Climate Action and Keep Funding Climate Denial

Image: Guardian Graphics

Yesterday, eleven leading environmental and sustainable business organizations published an open letter urging the CEOs of Corporate America to step up their engagement on climate policy.

  • The letter was signed by the heads of BSR, C2ES, CDP, Ceres, Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, The Climate Group, The Nature Conservancy, the Union of Concerned Scientists, World Resources Institute, and World Wildlife Fund.

The letter commended efforts by corporations to curb climate change but made it clear that their lobbying and political donations must also support government action on climate:

“Given their power to shape public policy, businesses have a vital role to play in moving smart and effective climate policies forward.”

What Should Companies Be Doing? In addition to adopting a science-based climate policy agenda in line with the recommendations of the IPCC, the letter outlined these specific actions for corporate leaders to enact:

· Advocate for policies at the national, subnational and/or sectoral level that are consistent with achieving net-zero emissions by 2050;

· Align their trade associations’ climate policy advocacy to be consistent with the goal of net-zero emissions by 2050; and

· Allocate advocacy spending to advance climate policies, not obstruct them.

Additionally, the groups called for corporate leadership on climate policy to become in line with the goals of the upcoming Santiago Climate Change Conference (COP 25), which will focus on increasing ambitious actions to tackle climate change.

As the Environmental Defense Fund wrote this past summer, “the most powerful tool that companies have to fight climate change is their political influence.”

Is This Really an Issue?: Sure is! If you watched the Democratic Presidential Debate last night you may have seen an ad paid for by the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) that was fearmongering the Green New Deal. CEI has been one of the major political forces that has undermined climate science and has worked diligently spread climate denial. Unfortunately, companies like Google and Amazon (who both identify climate change as a major threat) have donated to CEI and Mother Jones reported earlier this year that Facebook, Google, and Microsoft sponsored a conference that promotes climate change denial.

Why This Matters: Major corporations can’t be for fighting climate change if their political spending tells the exact opposite story. There’s no playing both sides here–corporate donations to candidates and groups who may support the specific industry to which a company belongs but vehemently undermine efforts to curb climate change is unacceptable and companies should be held accountable by the public. The Guardian recently wrote an investigative piece about the big contributions that Google has made to climate deniers and we can’t forget that we have the power to send Google a message. Imagine what would happen if folks stopped using Gmail or buying Google ads? Nothing would get the company’s attention more quickly. Boycotting is a powerful tool and perhaps we need to revisit the tactic for companies who are unwilling to align their political spending with their corporate sustainability statements–as well as the fate of our planet.

Go Deeper: You can read the individual statements from each of the 11 environmental groups here.

Up Next

Columbia University Will Create New A New Climate Change School “Like No Other”

Columbia University Will Create New A New Climate Change School “Like No Other”

Late last month, Columbia University President Lee Bollinger, acting on a recommendation by a university-wide Task Force, announced a bold new initiative — it will form a new cross-disciplinary “Climate School” to address “the long-term climate issues that will be with future generations, and will also act swiftly given the short timeframe with which the world must act.” 

Why This Matters:  There is nothing else like this proposed school in the U.S. and certainly not at an institution as prominent as Columbia.

Continue Reading 458 words
New Biotech Companies Aim to Shrink the Carbon Footprint of Cement

New Biotech Companies Aim to Shrink the Carbon Footprint of Cement

Cement accounts for 8% of the annual emissions of carbon dioxide globally and reducing the carbon emissions from the process of making it has been a tough nut to crack, The Wall Street Journal reports. But now climate-conscious entrepreneurs are working to develop three new construction materials that could replace cement (read more about them […]

Continue Reading 493 words
China Building To Dominate 21st Century’s Renewable Energy Sector And Fight Climate Change

China Building To Dominate 21st Century’s Renewable Energy Sector And Fight Climate Change

The U.S., Russia and Saudi Arabia may have dominated the 20th-century energy market, but according to an in-depth article in yesterday’s Houston Chronicle, China is now determined to dominate the 21st-century market in which energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions have become paramount for nations contending with climate change.

Why This Matters:  The United States, thanks to President Trump and his desire to prop up the dying coal, gas, and oil industries, is falling behind in this competition for the future energy market.

Continue Reading 516 words