Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Yale University
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Contributing Writer
Yale just published its annual 2020 Environmental Performance Index, ranking 180 countries from most to least sustainable, on metrics based on ecosystem health and environmental factors like water and air quality and waste management. The US ranked 24th, behind most of Europe and other wealthy democracies, including the United Kingdom (4th), France (5th), Germany (1th), Japan (12th), Canada (20th), and Italy (22nd). The analysis considers 32 performance indicators across 11 issue categories covering environmental health and ecosystem vitality. The 2020 EPI features new metrics that gauge waste management, carbon dioxide emissions from land cover change, and emissions of fluorinated gases all important drivers of climate change.
Why this Matters: This relatively bad ranking demonstrates the US’ growing environmental issues. The Trump administration has continued to allow increased emissions, weaken EPA protections, decrease monitoring and enforcement, and generally dismantle US environmental policy. It is only a surprise that the U.S. ranking did not sink further. Nevertheless, the U.S. is well ahead of China, which sits in 120th place, and that is 48 places ahead of India’s 168th place ranking.
Why The U.S. Fell
The US performed the worst on protecting water resources and managing waste.
The study suggests that the US is not effectively treating wastewater before releasing it into the environment, and much of the population is not connected to a sewage system, putting the US in 32nd place.
Moreover, half the trash generated in the US is unaccounted for. The EPA doesn’t have the resources to gather data about how much trash is recycled, incinerated or sent to landfills, leaving the US at 71st in waste management.
Dan Esty, who directs the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, told the Guardian: “Countries that make an effort do better than those that don’t and the US right now is not making an effort. That shows up in a stagnation in the rankings where others are really seeing some significant improvements.”
Taking a Cue from other Countries
In a press release, Esty remarked that the top four countries— Denmark, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the UK—share a commitment to “pursuing environmental policy with care and consistency and a commitment to following data-driven analysis” and that countries that take this approach tend to “outperform those that are more haphazard in their approach to sustainability.”
For the US to move up in the EPI rankings, it not only has to improve sustainability in key categories, but it also has to continue to uphold regulations in categories that it is already performing well on. For example, the US did much better on air quality, ranking 16th, but with wildfires spreading out of control and Trump officials loosening regulations on air pollution, it could easily slip next year.
The retailer H&M, which has long given a discount to shoppers who bring in old clothes to recycle, is taking its “game” to a whole new level. They’re partnering with Game of Thrones’ star Maisie Jones to promote their sustainability programs both online and in real life. Jones now has an avatar, and both of […]
by Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer A new UN report suggests that plastic pollution isn’t just a threat to marine life — it’s also an issue of environmental justice. The report, titled Neglected: Environmental Justice Impacts of Plastic Pollution, highlights that poor nations and communities around the world disproportionately suffer the effects of plastic waste. This […]
President Biden’s new infrastructure plan contains something surprising — funding for “construction” projects to remove highways. Why? Because for decades, Black communities in cities across the U.S. have been cut off and/or divided by highways and major roads that were built without regard to their impact on those neighborhoods.
Why This Matters: Highways built in the 50s and 60s often came at the expense of communities of color. Their impact enforced segregation, disrupt thriving communities, and distanced Black people from city resources and job opportunities.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.