Utilities Promising to Get to Net Zero Need Gas To Get There

Chart: Paul Horn, Inside Climate News

Numerous progressive utilities such as Xcel, which have pledged to be carbon neutral by 2050, are struggling to get there without expanding the use of natural gas and this is fueling a broader and divisive debate around gas’s future, according to Inside Climate News The plan drawn up by Xcel, which serves 3.6 million customers in eight states, is telling — they propose to retire coal plants early, but also to expand the use of natural gas by purchasing a gas plant and converting one of its coal plants to run on gas, as well as to dramatically expand solar and wind energy.

Why This Matters:  Going fossil fuel free for utilities is going to be really challenging. But local consumer and environmental activist groups are using utilities’ carbon-cutting pledges to extract promises to close coal plants sooner in exchange for not protesting increasing reliance on natural gas.  Natural gas energy plants certainly emit less than coal plants.  But the risk that these natural gas plants outlive their economic viability is also a problem.  The road to all renewable electricity generation looks like it is going to have some speed bumps on it.

Two Charts Tell The Story

The list of major power companies that have pledged to achieve drastic reductions or net-zero emissions in the next 30 years is impressive, including Duke Energy and the Southern Company.  But those companies plan to use a significant amount of natural gas to get there. According to Inside Climate News,

  • Duke Energy ‘s plan for North Carolina calls for the construction of about 10,000 megawatts of natural gas plants by 2033; and
  • DTE currently has a 1,100-megawatt gas plant under construction, and it plans to operate its largest coal plant into the 2040s.
  • Xcel’s new natural gas capacity in Minnesota will increase to about 1,600 megawatts.

However, further decreases in the cost of renewable energy will continue to force drastic changes to the industry, according to many experts, who are recommending even greater shifts to wind and solar energy because the costs associated with them are mostly upfront with no ongoing fuel costs.

And what happens after 2040 is still a bit up in the air — the companies are not certain how they will achieve the final emissions cuts — because current business plans don’t go out to 2050 with any specificity. Companies are banking on technologies that do not yet exist at a scale, the deployment of carbon-capture systems, or technologies that don’t even exist yet.

Chart: Paul Horn, Inside Climate News


Up Next

BP Commits To Slashing Its Oil and Gas Operations, A Necessary Step for Climate Action

BP Commits To Slashing Its Oil and Gas Operations, A Necessary Step for Climate Action

As Greentech Media reported, oil and gas giant BP announced yesterday that it will cut its oil and gas output by 40% by 2030 and increase its low-carbon investment tenfold by then as it begins to detail its 2050 net-zero strategy. This announcement comes after BP head of strategy Giulia Chierchia told investors on a […]

Continue Reading 637 words
Electric Vehicles Still Charging Ahead

Electric Vehicles Still Charging Ahead

Investment in electric vehicles and their components and infrastructure continue to grow in spite of the pandemic and economic downturn, not to mention the infancy of the market.  According to MarketWatch.com, there is “sky high” investor interest in clean energy and electric vehicle companies.

Why This Matters:  Former Vice President Biden’s new clean energy jobs proposal revives the “cash for clunkers” program but in a way that would juice this market.

Continue Reading 498 words
China’s Purchases and Investments In US Energy Are On Their Terms

China’s Purchases and Investments In US Energy Are On Their Terms

President Trump trumpeted his trade deal with China, but so far it has been a bust, according to The Wall Street Journal — the Chinese have not purchased nearly the amount of energy (in terms of total dollars) as they promised — only $2B in oil and gas purchases against a commitment of $25B for this year.

Why This Matters:  Trump’s energy policy is a colossal failure, especially when measured against his outlandish campaign promise of complete energy independence.

Continue Reading 550 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.