Warren’s New Plan Would Punish Exxon for Lying to Regulators

Image: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Yesterday, presidential candidate Senator Elizabeth Warren released a plan (!) calling for companies who have misled federal regulators to be prosecuted under a new corporate perjury law. She also singled out Exxon as her example, tying in climate change to her signature anti-corruption platform. As Climate Liability News explained,

  • Warren’s “Fighting Corporate Perjury” plan would allow corporate officers to be held criminally liable for providing false or misleading information, including by using industry-funded studies, to regulatory agencies.
  • The plan also would prohibit the use of non-peer-reviewed studies that are found to have a conflict of interest in federal rulemaking and related court challenges.
  • She called for the creation of a new Office of the Public Advocate, which would help the public participate in regulatory and legal proceedings.

Structural Change Indeed: Warren explains that big corporate interests often use tactics to gum up the regulatory process,

“That’s because when federal agencies like the EPA propose new regulations, they are generally required to solicit public input on proposed rules from the public through a process called “notice and comment.” The notice and comment process is important: It’s supposed to give the public a chance to weigh in on proposed regulations and help the agency solicit expert feedback, and agencies are legally required to respond to these comments. And even where the agency responds, if a company submits junk science to try and block the rule from happening, right-wing judges could point to those junk studies later on and use them as an excuse for invalidating the new rule.”

Why This Matters: Firstly what’s great about this plan is that Warren’s proposed Office of the Public Advocate would enable citizens to become more engaged in the rulemaking process, taking power away from big corporate lobbies.

Secondly, it’s critical in politics to tie climate change to all other top-level issues–in this instance, corruption. The issue of climate change cannot become a box to check for candidates with an isolated plan when in reality the climate crisis should be considered in all plans, from healthcare to immigration. For instance, Mayor Pete Buttigieg‘s recent veterans plan could have addressed climate issues like requiring the VA to update its climate assessments or how we clean up PFAS contamination on military bases. Voters need to know that presidential candidates are willing to make climate action a day 1 priority should they be elected. 

Up Next

How Joe Biden Aims to Center Climate Action in Foreign Policy

How Joe Biden Aims to Center Climate Action in Foreign Policy

As Axios reported yesterday based on insight received from the Biden campaign: foreign policy will look drastically different if Joe Biden defeats President Trump in November— starting with a Day One announcement that the U.S. is re-entering the Paris Climate Agreement and new global coordination of the coronavirus response. Why This Matters: Even though most […]

Continue Reading 443 words
One Canceled Out Thing: 6500 Years of Cooling

One Canceled Out Thing: 6500 Years of Cooling

A new study shows that climate change in the 150 years since the industrial revolution has canceled out the prior 6500 years of cooling.  The study, conducted by researchers at Northern Arizona University’s School of Earth and Sustainability (SES), examined a new compilation of paleoclimate data along with new statistical analyses and found that millennial-scale […]

Continue Reading 124 words
Antarctica Warming 3X the Global Average

Antarctica Warming 3X the Global Average

There’s been ample research to show that the Arctic is warming much faster than any other region on the planet. However, there’s been little media focus on what’s happening on the opposite side of the planet, until now. A new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on Monday has revealed that the South […]

Continue Reading 292 words