California Bans Pesticide That Harms Brain Development

Video: Earth Justice

California’s tough environmental regulations — and its divide with the Trump Administration on all things environment — just got bigger.  The San Francisco Chronicle and The Washington Post reported yesterday that California is placing a ban on agricultural use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos, which is used on a wide variety of crops “from apples to walnuts” because it is harmful to the farmworkers who spray it and children who ingest it.

  • California health officials made their decision because of mounting evidence that the pesticide can cause serious health effects on sensitive populations and children — even when exposed at only low levels.
  • The Governor of California proposed a fund of $5.7 million to support the transition to safer alternatives.
  • The ban will take 2 years to go into effect.

CBS News reported that:

  • The pesticide is chemically similar to a nerve gas developed by Nazi Germany before World War II.
  • Its heavy use has often left traces in drinking water sources.
  • A University of California at Berkeley study in 2012 found that 87 percent of umbilical cord blood samples tested from newborn babies contained detectable levels of the pesticide.

Other states have taken similar action banning it — as we have covered — including Hawaii (ban goes into effect in 2022), New York (ban goes into effect in 2021), and the states of Oregon, Connecticut, and New Jersey are debating whether to put a ban in place.  Federal regulators at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have so far maintained, along with its manufacturer DowDupont, that the product is safe and have refused to ban or regulate its use further.  Scientists recommended it be banned because it has been firmly linked to reduced IQ and attention deficit disorder in children. Moreover, for farmworkers, chlorpyrifos causes convulsions, respiratory paralysis, and, in extreme cases, death. When sprayed, the chemical drifts from fields into schools and homes. 

Why This Matters: Chlorypforos is dangerous.  The Obama Administration proposed banning it in 2015, but then EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt reversed that decision in 2017. Last August, as we reported, a federal court ordered EPA to impose the ban because of the agency’s own overwhelming scientific evidence of its harms on the mental and physical development of infants and children.  The Trump Administration has asked the court to reconsider and also to give the EPA more time to “justify” its use in agriculture. And of course, DowDupont vowed to fight the State of California.

Up Next

Top Ten Stories of 2020:  The Pandemic and Its Links To Pollution and Biodiversity Loss

Top Ten Stories of 2020: The Pandemic and Its Links To Pollution and Biodiversity Loss

This year has been indelibly shaped by the COVID pandemic — it literally changed everything.  What has become clear as a result is that environmental injustice was exacerbated by the pandemic, and if we don’t repair our relationship with the natural world we are going to face more deadly pandemics in the future.  For the […]

Continue Reading 350 words
Heightened PFAS Levels Linked to Severe COVID-19

Heightened PFAS Levels Linked to Severe COVID-19

by Amy Lupica, ODP Contributing Writer A new Danish study has found that elevated levels of Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of man-made chemicals linked to cancer, in the bloodstream are linked to severe COVID-19. The study observed 323 patients infected with the virus and found that those with elevated levels of the […]

Continue Reading 504 words

The Lancet’s Diagnosis: Climate Change Is Bad For Your Health

The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change represent converging crises, according to The Lancet, one of the oldest and most prestigious medical journals in the world.  This year’s edition of The Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change drives home the point that it is impacting everyone.

Why This Matters: Rising seas and rising temperatures are public health issues. More extreme heat worldwide means that people with pre-existing conditions, people who work outdoors, and the elderly all face a higher risk of heat-related death.

Continue Reading 421 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.