Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
California’s tough environmental regulations — and its divide with the Trump Administration on all things environment — just got bigger. The San Francisco Chronicle and The Washington Post reported yesterday that California is placing a ban on agricultural use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos, which is used on a wide variety of crops “from apples to walnuts” because it is harmful to the farmworkers who spray it and children who ingest it.
California health officials made their decision because of mounting evidence that the pesticide can cause serious health effects on sensitive populations and children — even when exposed at only low levels.
The Governor of California proposed a fund of $5.7 million to support the transition to safer alternatives.
The pesticide is chemically similar to a nerve gas developed by Nazi Germany before World War II.
Its heavy use has often left traces in drinking water sources.
A University of California at Berkeley study in 2012 found that 87 percent of umbilical cord blood samples tested from newborn babies contained detectable levels of the pesticide.
Other states have taken similar action banning it — as we have covered — including Hawaii (ban goes into effect in 2022), New York (ban goes into effect in 2021), and the states of Oregon, Connecticut, and New Jersey are debating whether to put a ban in place. Federal regulators at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have so far maintained, along with its manufacturer DowDupont, that the product is safe and have refused to ban or regulate its use further. Scientists recommended it be banned because it has been firmly linked to reduced IQ and attention deficit disorder in children. Moreover, for farmworkers, chlorpyrifos causes convulsions, respiratory paralysis, and, in extreme cases, death. When sprayed, the chemical drifts from fields into schools and homes.
Why This Matters: Chlorypforos is dangerous. The Obama Administration proposed banning it in 2015, but then EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt reversed that decision in 2017. Last August, as we reported, a federal court ordered EPA to impose the ban because of the agency’s own overwhelming scientific evidence of its harms on the mental and physical development of infants and children. The Trump Administration has asked the court to reconsider and also to give the EPA more time to “justify” its use in agriculture. And of course, DowDupont vowed to fight the State of California.
Why This Matters: The estimates of global deaths that will be attributable to climate change just keep going up. The climate crisis could, in fact, “halt and reverse” all the progress made in human health over the past century.
According to a new study conducted by Healthcare Without Harm, if the global health care sector were a country, it would be the fifth-largest greenhouse gas emitter on the planet. Not only are doctors, nurses and health facilities all first responders to the impacts of climate change, but hospitals and health care systems paradoxically make a major contribution to […]