Climate Change Worsening Global Inequality

Women carry jerry cans of water from shallow wells dug from the sand along the Shabelle River bed in Somalia’s Shabelle region. Photo: Feisal Omar/Reuters

A new study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has suggested that climate change has worsened global inequality and has caused the most economic harm to nations who have done the least to contribute to climate change. Additionally, countries with the highest temperatures suffered the most economic damage. As CNN Business explained, “in absolute terms, many of those countries have actually boosted their economic output significantly over the past half century, and as a result, inequality between countries has declined in recent years. However, that progress could have moved faster if temperatures weren’t rising, the study found.” Noah S. Diffenbaugh, author of the study stated that while climate change didn’t cause inequality it “put a drag on improvement.”

David Waskow, director of the World Resources Institute’s International Climate Initiative told Inside Climate News that the “findings here really are very much in line with what we have been seeing on the ground in terms of the impacts that particularly vulnerable countries have been facing and especially those that are lower-income countries.”

But other experts argued that the results of the study might be overstated. Solomon Hsiang, a visiting scholar at Stanford’s Center on Food Security and the Environment, questioned whether the study could support a conclusion that rich countries had benefited, as well as some of the methods used in the analysis. He noted that previous research suggests that cold-climate countries might benefit from warming initially, but that the long-term harm means a net loss over time.

Why This Matters: The outcomes observed by this study are also echoed in the United States where warmer southern cities will experience more severe economic inequality as a result of climate change in the future. Climate change hits the most vulnerable populations the hardest and along with income inequality can bring increased political unrest and destabilization–something that even the Pentagon acknowledges. As an international community, we know that these threats exist yet we’ve been far too slow to act. In the 2020 race here in the U.S.  and in future elections around the world, we have an opportunity to vote in candidates who are willing to pursue bold climate action to ensure that the global future isn’t marked by scarcity and instability.

Go Deeper: See how other nations around the world are addressing climate change.

Up Next

Can Cities Build New Stadiums That Will Last 100 Years Given Climate Change?

Can Cities Build New Stadiums That Will Last 100 Years Given Climate Change?

A new stadium is a major economic boon and a huge financial commitment for the cities and sports teams that build them — and as a result, increasingly climate change impacts on these facilities are being taken into account in the building process.  The Washington Post reported last week that if sea levels were to rise 5 or 6 feet, numerous arenas and sports facilities in the United States would likely experience flooding including “TD Garden in Boston, Citi Field in New York, MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, Petco Park in San Diego, Del Mar Racetrack in California, and Oracle Park in San Francisco” with huge economic consequences.

Why This Matters: Because stadiums and arenas are so expensive and so iconic — think Fenway Park or Yankee Stadium — the builders have to confront today the question of climate impacts such as sea-level rise and extreme heat projected well into the future.

Continue Reading 485 words
U.S. Companies Can’t be “For” Climate Action and Keep Funding Climate Denial

U.S. Companies Can’t be “For” Climate Action and Keep Funding Climate Denial

Yesterday, eleven leading environmental and sustainable business organizations published an open letter urging the CEOs of Corporate America to step up their engagement on climate policy.

Why This Matters: Major corporations can’t be for fighting climate change if their political spending tells the exact opposite story.

Continue Reading 522 words
Most Ohio Voters Believe Climate Change is Real and Impacting the U.S. Now

Most Ohio Voters Believe Climate Change is Real and Impacting the U.S. Now

Seven out of ten Ohio adults believe climate change is real and impacting the U.S. today, and nearly 60 percent believe that it is impacting their own community according to a recent poll.

Why This Matters:  If Ohio residents care this much about climate change, it is a fair bet that so do a majority of residents in other states.  Climate change could be a very important issue in the 2020 election if Democrats would seize on it and talk about it more.

Continue Reading 496 words