Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Yesterday the EPA released its long-awaited plan to address Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) a family of chemicals that are linked to cancer and other illnesses, and that are found widely across the U.S. in drinking water and soil. But the “action” plan, which promises to begin a process by the end of the year to set limits on the release of these chemicals, contains no immediate plan to address this terrible problem that has plagued communities across the nation. ODP has reported several times on the extent of the problem — it is particularly acute in communities with military bases and 3M plants, which both used the chemicals extensively. According to The Hill, EPA’s own data show 1.3 percent of all public water systems had detections of PFAS at or above the nation’s health advisory level.
PFASs are found in numerous commercial household items such as food packaging, cleaners, water-repellent fabrics, Teflon-coated cookware and cleaning products, plus industrial products like firefighting foams.
It has leached into groundwater sources that reach millions of Americans via their drinking water.
The chemicals are extremely toxic — they have been linked to reproductive and developmental, liver and kidney, and immunological effects, and they can also contribute to low infant birth weights, thyroid problems and some cancers.
Democratic Members of Congress and environmental groups immediately called the plan too little, too late. Scott Faber, senior vice president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that the plan would actually permit even greater harm, “This so-called plan is actually a recipe for more PFAS contamination, not less,” Faber said in a press statement. “It’s shameful that the EPA has taken two decades to produce a plan that allows increased exposure to compounds whose makers have used the American people as guinea pigs and, with the EPA’s complicity, covered it up.” EPA officials steadfastly maintained that the agency is committed to putting a regulation in place.
Why This Matters: Last year the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention urged EPA to act after it concluded that the chemicals may endanger human health at far lower levels than the EPA’s current non-binding limit. The time for study is long passed. Since EPA has been so slow to act, many states have issued regulations of their own limiting PFAS emissions, even in the face of industry objections to the cost. It is high time for the EPA to take bold action. There is no excuse for further delay — EPA could begin the rulemaking process immediately. Clean water and a safe environment should be something that all Americans can count on.
Monsanto has lost another appeal — this one a $25 million damages award to a San Francisco resident who suffered from cancer after spraying Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide on his property for more than 26 years, The San Francisco Chronicle reported.
Why This Matters: There are thousands of cases pending against Monsanto for Roundup — a common weedkiller used in residential yards all across the U.S.
EPA’s acting chief of enforcement sent a memo to staff last week (that The Hill obtained) calling for them to “[s]trengthen enforcement in overburdened communities by resolving environmental noncompliance through remedies with tangible benefits for the community” with a particular emphasis on “cornerstone environmental statutes.”
Why This Matters: The Biden administration can immediately make progress correcting environmental injustice through fair and strong enforcement of current laws
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.