Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle.
Our Daily Planet is a daily morning email (M-F) to keep you informed of the stories shaping our environment. If these issues matter to you, we’d like to be the best ten minutes of your morning.
Yesterday the EPA released its long-awaited plan to address Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) a family of chemicals that are linked to cancer and other illnesses, and that are found widely across the U.S. in drinking water and soil. But the “action” plan, which promises to begin a process by the end of the year to set limits on the release of these chemicals, contains no immediate plan to address this terrible problem that has plagued communities across the nation. ODP has reported several times on the extent of the problem — it is particularly acute in communities with military bases and 3M plants, which both used the chemicals extensively. According to The Hill, EPA’s own data show 1.3 percent of all public water systems had detections of PFAS at or above the nation’s health advisory level.
PFASs are found in numerous commercial household items such as food packaging, cleaners, water-repellent fabrics, Teflon-coated cookware and cleaning products, plus industrial products like firefighting foams.
It has leached into groundwater sources that reach millions of Americans via their drinking water.
The chemicals are extremely toxic — they have been linked to reproductive and developmental, liver and kidney, and immunological effects, and they can also contribute to low infant birth weights, thyroid problems and some cancers.
Democratic Members of Congress and environmental groups immediately called the plan too little, too late. Scott Faber, senior vice president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that the plan would actually permit even greater harm, “This so-called plan is actually a recipe for more PFAS contamination, not less,” Faber said in a press statement. “It’s shameful that the EPA has taken two decades to produce a plan that allows increased exposure to compounds whose makers have used the American people as guinea pigs and, with the EPA’s complicity, covered it up.” EPA officials steadfastly maintained that the agency is committed to putting a regulation in place.
Why This Matters: Last year the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention urged EPA to act after it concluded that the chemicals may endanger human health at far lower levels than the EPA’s current non-binding limit. The time for study is long passed. Since EPA has been so slow to act, many states have issued regulations of their own limiting PFAS emissions, even in the face of industry objections to the cost. It is high time for the EPA to take bold action. There is no excuse for further delay — EPA could begin the rulemaking process immediately. Clean water and a safe environment should be something that all Americans can count on.
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer This week, the medical journal Lancet published their annual report on health in relation to climate change, subtitling it: “code red for a healthy future.” The report delves beyond the obvious effects of wildfires, hurricanes, and extreme weather events — looking at food security; livelihoods; human physical and mental […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer The EPA announced Monday that it will move toward regulating perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) — manmade “forever chemicals” — that don’t naturally break down and can contaminate both air and water. These chemicals, found in various household products, from dental floss to nonstick pans, can also be harmful […]
The editors of over 230 medical journals said in a statement on Monday that climate change is a health issue and that its effects could become “catastrophic” if world leaders don’t do more to address it. The health impacts of climate change include wildfire smoke–which has been linked to an increase in positive COVID-19 cases–and pollutants […]
Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.
Want the lastest climate news summarized for you each morning?
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.