Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
A hearing on Capitol Hill today probed EPA’s failure to set safety standards for a class of toxic chemicals called perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) — also called the “forever chemicals” because they take thousands of years to break down. Both Democrats and Republicans are concerned because PFAS has seeped into many public water systems in the United States and globally, especially near and on military bases and industrial sites, exposing millions to these chemicals at dangerous levels and causing health problems in those communities. According to Military Times, David Ross, of the EPA’s water office, defended the agency’s decision to continue researching the compounds before taking any formal regulatory action, saying that the science on PFAS “is not yet as robust as it needs to be.”
Last year, the Pentagon said there were 401 installations where there are known or suspected releases of the two best known PFAS chemicals, PFOS and PFOA, into groundwater.
The Environmental Working Group found that there are 106 military sites in the U.S. where the drinking water or groundwater is contaminated with PFAS at levels that exceed the Environmental Protection Agency’s health guideline.
As we have reported for nearly a year, military families are understandably upset about the risks they are facing from PFAS contamination. Representative Dan Kildee of Michigan explained to the Committee that veterans and families are increasingly fearful of PFAS contamination around bases; “[t]he Defense Department in particular has so far failed to act with the required urgency to address this growing problem,” he said. The Military Times reports that some states and communities with military installations have accused the Pentagon of using the lack of any mandatory federal limit for PFAS in drinking water as a reason to deny its responsibility for cleanup and the military has yet to request any funding to clean up PFAS contamination on and near installations.New Mexico sued the Air Force on Tuesday over PFAS contamination around two bases in that state.
Why This Matters: The Trump Administration wants to take billions of dollars from DOD’s military construction budget to build the border wall. That money would be better spent on this PFAS contamination crisis that is poisoning the water in and around military bases. And EPA should issue an interim or emergency rule on PFAS if they cannot yet make a definitive determination on proper contamination limits. Why not err on the side of public safety? It seems as if this Administration does not know a real emergency when they see one. Why should our veterans and their families be put at risk any longer? DOD’s budget is more than $600 billion annually — $2 billion does not seem such a high price to pay to clean up this mess. At the very least, if DOD requested the funding, Congress would likely give it to them.
By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor In August, the federal government declared the first-ever water shortage along the Colorado River as drought pushed its largest reservoir, Lake Mead, to record lows. Now, that shortage is threatening the power supply of 5.8 million homes and businesses and water levels at the nation’s second largest reservoir, Lake […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer The controversial Line 3, a pipeline expansion under construction in northern Minnesota that would transport one million barrels of tar sands per day, hasn’t begun operating yet, but is already causing harm. The line’s construction, coupled with drought, has created low water levels in Minnesota lakes where Indigenous Anishinaabe […]
By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor In another significant blow to the Pebble Mine project in Alaska, the EPA has asked a federal court to allow Clean Water Act protections for parts of Bristol Bay, a body of water that stands to be decimated if the project continues. Environmental advocates and Alaska Native tribes hope […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.