Flint water crisis: what’s next?

Flint Lives Matter

Photo: Flint Lives Matter

We’ve written this week about what happened to cause the Flint water crisis, who (if anyone) is being held accountable and what is being done by the current governor to ensure that a case of injustice at this magnitude doesn’t happen again. It’s difficult to give an exact prescription of how to prevent a story like Flint from happening again because throughout our history, low-income, minority communities like Flint have been neglected and forgotten. Flint is one of many Rust Belt cities that was built up around a thriving manufacturing industry (GM, in the case of Flint) and when these jobs abruptly left, the largely one-industry community was not able to grapple with the fallout. “Fixing” Flint is going to have to be part of a broader strategy to provide economic relief to other cities like it. In the same way that we must help former coal towns, our nation owes the people of industrial towns a helping hand for all that they’ve given our country.

However, with Flint comes that added shame of decades of racist policies that didn’t allow black Americans to benefit from the economic boom in the auto industry in the same way that white Americans were able to. As US News explained, decades of racist housing practices – including by General Motors – had ensured Flint’s black population remained concentrated, while the city proper, researchers Andrew Highsmith and Richard Sadler argue in a 2016 report, was also deliberately disadvantaged by policy. In the 1960s and ’70s, as the metro area expanded and people and money bled outward, suburbs – mostly white – passed laws that strengthened their own municipal power in order to hoard resources and block Flint’s expansion attempts. The state, embracing an economic model that espoused competition among municipalities instead of regional collaboration, cut off some $55 million in revenue to the city between 2003 and 2014 – only to appoint an emergency manager who would initiate the fateful water supply switch.

Even amidst all of the gross marginalization, the people of Flint have been tireless advocates for their city despite all the odds stacked against them. The city’s 20-year master plan, offers a vision of a far more livable, sustainable city, based around concentrated economic development, green spaces in place of neglected properties, and improved transit. It’s a highly ambitious plan, but many are buying in. The water crisis, experts and residents say, has also served as a kind of catalyst for change, bringing fresh energy and resources to decades-old problems – and channeling anger into activism. It’s also important to remember that financial burdens will continue to plague Flint mostly because its population and tax base is shrinking despite fiscal obligations (such as city pensions) that are unavoidable. Bottom line: Flint will need continued support from the state and federal level to ensure the safety and wellbeing of its citizens.

Why This Matters: President Obama’s EPA administrator, Gina McCarthy, led the agency in creating a revised Drinking Water Action Plan to help prevent a crisis like Flint from happening again. However, under president Trump and the disastrous leadership of his first administrator Scott Pruitt nearly 1,600 federal workers have left the EPA so it’s entirely unclear if this current presidential administration has any plans to adhere to the Obama-era drinking water plan or staff the regulatory roles necessary to carry it out. What happened in Flint was first and foremost a failure of government at the hands of former Michigan Governor Rick Snyder but it will take a sustained state and federal effort to keep the city from falling behind–there’s no other way around it. We cannot forget cities like Flint once the cameras leave and the water is deemed “safe,” helping our fellow Americans will mean all of us voting for candidates who support regulators and government spending to help economically suppressed regions of our nation.

 

 

Up Next

EPA Proposes New Rules for Getting Lead Out of Drinking Water – More Slowly

EPA Proposes New Rules for Getting Lead Out of Drinking Water – More Slowly

The Trump administration — after years of promising and more than 9 years of work by EPA — finally issued a proposed rule on lead in drinking water that does not require the removal of the estimated 6 million or more lead service lines that remain underground throughout the nation, and in fact, it doubles the amount of time allotted to replace lead pipes in water systems that contain high levels of lead.

Why This Matters:  They may try to put lipstick on this pig (sorry for the old pun), and it could have been worse, but when the Trump Administration brags that they put this rule in place, the question should be why did they not do more? This proposed rule is hardly sufficient to deal with the scope and the harm caused by lead in drinking water in this nation. 

Continue Reading 438 words
7.5 Million Californians Affected by Toxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

7.5 Million Californians Affected by Toxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

A recent study by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that 74 community water systems in California, which serve 7.5 million people, were contaminated with toxic fluorinated chemicals known as PFAS between 2013 and 2019. Why This Matters: The chemical companies that have made these chemicals for use in their products (like DuPont and 3M) largely pass along the cleanup costs of water sources onto municipalities and taxpayers.

 

Continue Reading 414 words
Water Crisis Deepens in Zimbabwe – 2 Million People’s Supply Cut Off

Water Crisis Deepens in Zimbabwe – 2 Million People’s Supply Cut Off

CBS News and CNN are reporting that because of a major drought in Zimbabwe that occurred for months, more than 2 million residents of Zimbabwe’s capital and surrounding towns were without tap water on Tuesday because city officials had to shut down the city’s main treatment plant — they do not have the money to […]

Continue Reading 406 words