How Protected are Protected Areas? The Data Might Shock You.

Changes in protected areas from 1892 to 2018. Image: Rachel E. Golden Kroner et al

Rollbacks on Protected Areas Sets a Dangerous Precedent

A protected area is a legally defined geographical space that’s actively managed to protect it in the long term from destructive human activities. These areas are crucial to the conservation of vulnerable species as well as the preservation of places of spiritual importance to indigenous people. However, a recent study published in Science Magazine shows that rollbacks of protected areas in the United States have vastly accelerated over recent decades.

Trump Compounds Historical Trends: From 1944 to 2017, 737 proposals for the downgrading, downsizing or complete stripping of all legal protection of protected areas took place within the United States, with a shocking  90% having occurred in the 2000’s alone. But under the Trump administration, two of the biggest rollbacks in the history of the United States took place in Utah in 2017.

Prioritizing Industry over Environment: This study found that 99% percent of the proposals for altering or eliminating protected areas were associated with industrial-scale development. After 114 failed proposals over 30 years, the Trump administration approved and established an oil and gas leasing program for the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska – overriding President Obama’s previous proclamation that declared the area as off-limits for drilling for environmental purposes.

Climate Mitigation and Adaption: Protected areas are crucial to mitigating and adapting to climate change. Over 312 gigatons of carbon – 15% of the global carbon stocks – is stored in protected areas. Protected mountain forests, coastal reefs and other ecosystems buffer human communities against disastrous events and provide a suite of services such as water and agricultural systems.

Why This Matters: The United States is home to the first modern protected areas—Yellowstone and Yosemite National Parks—and we’ve historically been a global conservation leader but with these trends of downscaling the fate of our public lands is in jeopardy. Debates on how our public lands should be managed date back to the time of President Teddy Roosevelt, but the Trump administration has taken the stance that their existence isn’t valuable beyond resource extraction.

Walking the Walk:2016 Harvard Kennedy School study revealed that more than 93% of respondents across the country said it’s important that historical sites, public lands, and national parks be protected for current and future generations. If that’s the case then we have to vote for candidates who support the protection (and even expansion) of public lands.

Up Next

GAO Report Warns: EPA Must Prepare Superfund Sites for Natural Disasters

GAO Report Warns: EPA Must Prepare Superfund Sites for Natural Disasters


According to a new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, climate change may increase the frequency and intensity of certain natural disasters, which could damage Superfund sites—the nation’s most contaminated hazardous waste sites.

Why This Matters: Spilled Superfund sites can cause deadly outcomes for the people that have to live near them, not to mention the havoc they wreak on wildlife.

Continue Reading 394 words
Deep Breath Millennials, Climate Change is Coming for Your Truffles

Deep Breath Millennials, Climate Change is Coming for Your Truffles

Rising global temperatures are worrying truffle hunters around the Italian town of Alba, where the most prized specimens can fetch twice the price of gold. To stave off the longer-term climate change impact on the production of the highly prized white truffle, experts have launched initiatives to better preserve the territory where they grow.

Continue Reading 333 words
House of Representatives Votes To Protect Sacred Sites and Iconic Landscapes from Mining

House of Representatives Votes To Protect Sacred Sites and Iconic Landscapes from Mining

The Grand Canyon National Park and Chaco Culture National Park both are under threat from nearby mining and drilling developments being advanced by the Trump Administration.  The House of Representatives voted by comfortable margins on Wednesday to protect both Parks from contamination by banning nearby extraction activities, but there is no companion legislation in the Senate so these measures will likely stall now.  

Why This Matters:  The Trump Team is trying to “camouflage” its plans to expand mining near the Grand Canyon as a national security imperative and then pad the pockets of the developers by having the government buy the uranium.  The Grand Canyon is one of the most iconic U.S. Parks and a natural wonder — it is hard to imagine the public would support uranium mining adjacent to the Park — it is a national treasure.  

Continue Reading 423 words