Industry pushes back on the Lake Erie Bill of Rights

Aerial view of algae blooms in Lake Erie, seen in Sept 2017. Photo: NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research

We wrote a couple of weeks ago about the Lake Erie Bill of Rights, an initiative that requires the Toledo City Charter be amended to ensure the Lake Erie watershed has legal rights to “exist and flourish,” and provides a right for citizens to sue private actors that threaten the Lake’s health. While the Bill of Rights has been praised by environmental groups and the activists responsible for its passage have been invited to speak at the UN General Assembly next week, farmers and industry groups (includig BP) have actively worked to oppose it. 

Agriculture is big business in Ohio and more than 70% of land in the Maumee watershed, which covers 4 million acres and is the biggest watershed in the Great Lakes is used for farming. As Treehugger explained:

  • Animal feeding operations throughout the watershed have expanded rapidly over the past 15 years, from 9 million animals in 2005 to 20.4 in 2018.
  • But, as the Environmental Working Group states, only operations above a certain size are subject to regulation by government agencies, which means there’s little reliable information on where and how many of these facilities exist, and the amount of manure and phosphorus they produce.
  • Much of this manure is sold to farmers who use it to fertilize croplands, both in solid and liquid form. This is contentious for a few reasons. First, some argue there’s too much manure in the region for it to be applied to farmland at “an agronomic rate” and an alternative means of disposal needs to be found. Second, farmers shouldn’t be spraying liquid manure and should focus on spreading solid instead, as it’s not so prone to runoff.

Farmers don’t want to be limited by how much manure they apply or how they do it and also don’t want to be subject to lawsuits they feel are unjust. In addition, it was revealed this past week that ads which were run in opposition to the Bill of Rights were funded by BP Corp. North America. In a statement from Michael Abendhoff, BP America’s media affairs director, BP funded the ads because it “believes a healthy Lake Erie is important to the region and to our employees who live and work along its shores … That’s why we support the rigorous environmental permitting already in place and strong enforcement of existing laws to help protect this precious natural resource.”

Why This Matters: Toledo, Ohio’s Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz is one of the biggest supporters of the Lake Erie Bill of Rights and for good reason, he knows more than anyone the environmental destruction inflicted on the Great Lake is largely the result of lax environmental laws. The Bill of Rights will undoubtedly be challenged but hopefully, it can become the blueprint for protecting and giving personhood to other national treasures, bodies of water, and natural places. It should also serve as a reminder that our consumption of resources like produce and meat exacts a toll on our planet and that we should actively work to limit our consumption of meat and be mindful of how much produce we purchase and waste.

Up Next

Dam Failures a Risk Across the Country Due to Climate Change

Dam Failures a Risk Across the Country Due to Climate Change

The Edenville Dam failure in Michigan causing thousands to evacuate puts a spotlight on a problem that the American Society of Civil Engineers highlighted in 2017 when it gave our country a “D” for dam safety (yep – that’s it’s grade) but this grade has not significantly improved in the last 20 years.

Why This Matters:  When we think about the security risks to our nation, we need to start counting infrastructure failure due to climate change as one of the most troubling.

Continue Reading 602 words
California Wins Battle With Trump Administration About Water and Endangered Species

California Wins Battle With Trump Administration About Water and Endangered Species

A federal court on Monday put on hold President Trump’s February order that overturned agency scientists and revised federal water supply plans in California, frustrating a political promise he made to farmers in central California to lift water restrictions for the benefit of agriculture there. 

Why This Matters:  This decision is just a temporary hold on the Trump administration’s water grab.  But the time is key for both the species at risk of extinction and for the farmers who will lose out on additional water that they would get to take out of the system for agriculture now, while there is spring runoff happening — water they can’t get back later because it is already flushed through the system.

Continue Reading 504 words
Frontline Communities Lacking Clean Water Can’t Fight Coronavirus Effectively

Frontline Communities Lacking Clean Water Can’t Fight Coronavirus Effectively

Shocking as it may be, there are 2 million Americans living in such poverty that they lack running water, and tens of millions of others may have water in their homes but it is hardly safe to bathe in, much less drink, The Washington Post reports.  These extreme conditions are exacerbating the spread of COVID-19 in minority communities in the deep south and Navajo Country

Why This Matters:  With some states reopening despite Dr. Anthony Fauci’s warning today that we are not yet ready, we are all only as safe from the virus as the most vulnerable among us.

Continue Reading 499 words