Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
A federal judge in Alaska dealt a major blow late Friday to the Trump Administration’s plan to allow drilling for oil and gas in the ocean waters off the North Slope of Alaska and in deep-sea canyons in the Atlantic Ocean. President Obama used his statutory authority under the law governing ocean oil and gas drilling to “withdraw” these areas from ANY subsequent plan to lease them out, but three months after taking office, President Trump “revoked” the Obama decision. Judge Sharon Gleason, an Obama appointee, held that the law was explicit in giving the President authority to “withdraw” lands but silent about “revocation” of a withdrawal, and thus the President Trump’s action was illegal.
A coalition of environmental and Native American groups challenged President Trump’s revocation, arguing that only Congress can overturn President Obama’s withdrawals. The oil and gas lobby disagreed, saying it was not right that one President could permanently withdraw areas (and potentially the entire U.S. offshore) from oil and gas leasing.
Most of the offshore areas of the U.S. have been off limits to drilling since 1988. President George H.W. Bush first placed much of the U.S. offshore (other than the Western Gulf of Mexico) off limits to oil and gas leasing — but only for ten years. President Clinton extended that drilling ban for another ten years. President George W. Bush did not extend the ban. President Obama ultimately decided late in his second term to withdraw permanently these specific areas from oil and gas leasing.
Why This Matters: The Trump Administration has now, according to The Post, lost more than two dozen environmental lawsuits in which they tried to roll back Obama-era environmental policies but failed because they did not follow the law. As The Post points out, this has significantly stymied their efforts to “pump up” the oil and gas industry and frustrated their desire to increase drilling both on the land and in the sea. However, as these cases are appealed, the Trump Administration’s extensive judicial appointments, not to mention a majority of the Supreme Court, may make the favorable lower court decisions tough to sustain even if President Trump is not re-elected. The only good news is that with oil prices low, The Wall Street Journal reported that there is little real interest in drilling in the Arctic anyway. Moreover, offshore oil and gas drilling is overwhelmingly unpopular. The one ongoing oil and gas development project there, the Liberty Project (on a legacy lease in the Beaufort Sea that the Trump Administration gave the go-ahead to last year) had to be slowed recently because of the loss of sea ice due to climate change.
Chicago-based Invenergy announced this week that it will construct at a site in northeastern Texas a $1.6 billion project that will provide 1,310-megawatts of solar energy by 2023. The project is likely to create approximately 600 jobs during the construction, as well as bring in more than $250 million in landowner payments and $200 million in […]
by Ashira Morris, ODP Contributing Writer Since the beginning of the pandemic, most Americans have received a single check for $1,200. However, fossil fuel companies are not most Americans. The US government spent big — $15 billion dollars big — to help the companies responsible for the climate crisis. According to a new analysis by […]
On Friday, the Treasury Department proposed a rule that states that “decisions by banks to not serve a specific customer should be based on individual risks, rather than a categorical exclusion.” according to The Hill.
Why This Matters: This kind of government mandate overriding the free market smacks of, well, socialism or cronyism or both. And while oil ad gas companies are now hurting, they’ve reaped billions from our dependence on oil and gas for fuel.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.