LA Bus Ridership Drops, Putting a Dent in Emissions Reductions Goals

One of LA’s public buses. Image: Al Seib/LA Times

Los Angeles has never been known for its public transit but in recent years its bus ridership has been falling as Angelenos are–among other factors–capitalizing on a stronger economy by buying cars in record numbers. As the LA Times reported, experts also point to several other factors putting pressure on bus systems, including falling immigration rates, rising rents that have pushed low-income families to more remote areas, and a law that allows immigrants in the country illegally to apply for driver’s licenses. Moreover, LA voters continue to vote for higher taxes to expand public transportation but aren’t actually taking it themselves.

What’s Going On: Bus riders have many complaints about taking the bus include that it feels too slow, infrequent, dangerous or inconvenient and many have even said that the skeevy fabric seats were the last straw. And the buses are slowing down: the average speed of a Metro bus has dropped 12.5% over the last 25 years, according to data analyzed by UCLA. The LA Times also noted that

  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority buses, which carry most of the county’s bus riders, have lost nearly 95 million trips over a decade, according to federal data. The 25% drop is the steepest among the busiest transit systems in the United States and accounted for the majority of California’s transit ridership decline.

What’s Being Done: To reverse the slump, Metro is preparing to redesign its network of 165 lines and 14,000 stops for the first time in a generation. A study launched two years ago is examining where people go and what can be done to make the bus more competitive with driving. The Metro Board of Directors has also recently approved the expansion of light rail and bus rapid transit lines (BRT), but LA Mayor Eric Garcetti joked of BRT lines that they are only “slightly less controversial than congestion pricing, once your street gets announced.”

Why This Matters: Reducing single-occupancy vehicle use is a key goal for the state of California and its biggest cities to achieve as part of a broader plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help curb climate change. Transportation is currently the state’s largest source of emissions accounting for 41% of total GHG emissions and if LA is to meet its voluntary agreement to reduce emissions 50% below 1990 levels by 2025, or California’s state law of 40% reduction in emissions from 2020 to 2030 then more people need to turn to low-emission public transit. Full city buses are some of the most efficient means of transit yet people will only turn to them as a means of last resort unless they’re clean, efficient, and on-time.

Up Next

BP Commits To Slashing Its Oil and Gas Operations, A Necessary Step for Climate Action

BP Commits To Slashing Its Oil and Gas Operations, A Necessary Step for Climate Action

As Greentech Media reported, oil and gas giant BP announced yesterday that it will cut its oil and gas output by 40% by 2030 and increase its low-carbon investment tenfold by then as it begins to detail its 2050 net-zero strategy. This announcement comes after BP head of strategy Giulia Chierchia told investors on a […]

Continue Reading 637 words
Electric Vehicles Still Charging Ahead

Electric Vehicles Still Charging Ahead

Investment in electric vehicles and their components and infrastructure continue to grow in spite of the pandemic and economic downturn, not to mention the infancy of the market.  According to MarketWatch.com, there is “sky high” investor interest in clean energy and electric vehicle companies.

Why This Matters:  Former Vice President Biden’s new clean energy jobs proposal revives the “cash for clunkers” program but in a way that would juice this market.

Continue Reading 498 words
China’s Purchases and Investments In US Energy Are On Their Terms

China’s Purchases and Investments In US Energy Are On Their Terms

President Trump trumpeted his trade deal with China, but so far it has been a bust, according to The Wall Street Journal — the Chinese have not purchased nearly the amount of energy (in terms of total dollars) as they promised — only $2B in oil and gas purchases against a commitment of $25B for this year.

Why This Matters:  Trump’s energy policy is a colossal failure, especially when measured against his outlandish campaign promise of complete energy independence.

Continue Reading 550 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.