Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
A new study published on Tuesday by the National Academies of Science found that all the marine life in the ocean will decline by one-sixth by the year 2100 under the high emissions global warming scenario but on by 5% if we can stay within the low emissions scenario — with an average 5% decline for every 1 °C of warming. These losses are driven by temperature increases rather than fishing and were more significant in the tropics.
Why This Matters: These are some of the most renowned scientists when it comes to ocean productivity and their research provides an important contrast between best and worst case scenarios, which should motivate us to act to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. As was made clear by the U.N. Extinction Report, we humans rely on the natural world for our existence. “Healthy oceans are required for planetary stability,” University of Georgia marine biologist Samantha Joye told the Associated Press (AP). The bad news is that if we don’t get greenhouse gas emissions under control, we will lose billions of fish that we need to feed the planet. But the good news is that if we can reduce our emissions and keep temperature increases lower, we can stave off a global food security disaster.
What Is New In This Study? Scientists already knew that climate change and ocean warming would reduce the amount of marine life (or biomass), but past computer simulations looked at only part of the picture or used only one model, whereas this study uses six different state-of-the-art computer models that give the best big-picture look yet, according to William Cheung, a marine ecologist at the University of British Columbia said.
The Biggest Losers: The AP reported that the largest animals in the oceans are going to be hit hardest according to study co-author Derek Tittensor, a marine ecologist at the United Nations World Conservation Monitoring Center in England. But there’s more — tropical areas, already warm, will also see the biggest losses, according to Cheung.
One Bright Spot: Study co-author Boris Worm, a marine biologist at Dalhousie University in Canada, told the AP the “good news” is the decline will be less heavy in smaller organisms that are “the main building blocks of marine life,” such as plankton and bacteria.
The people who flocked to Cocoa Beach in Florida last weekend left behind 13,000 pounds of litter, prompting the police to threaten a crackdown. Local officials believe that as social distancing and stay in place orders are loosened in parts of the state, there has been an influx of day-trippers who show up and leave […]
Even in the midst of a global pandemic, big conservation wins are possible. Niue is a small island nation in the Pacific but it just made a huge contribution to global ocean health by finalizing this week the creation of an enormous marine protected area comprising 40% of the country’s vast ocean territory. The new protected […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.