New Orleans Levees Sinking, City Sues Oil Companies

Part of New Orleans’ levee system      Photo: Edmund D. Fountain, The Lens NOLA

According to E&E News, the $14 billion levee system, which was recently totally rebuilt to better defend the New Orleans in the event of another catastrophic storm like Hurricane Katrina, is subsiding and soon may not provide sufficient protection from a 100-year storm.

  • NOLA.com reported last week that the Army Corps of Engineers will study potential improvements — portions of the post-Katrina levee system are likely to be inadequate to reduce risk from stormwater surges because climate change is increasing the intensity of storms and sea level rise, and because the soils beneath the levees and wetlands that surround them are sinking.
  • Even if the studies find that the proposed improvements to the levees are both feasible and cost-effective, Congress will still have to fund 75 percent of construction costs and the state of Louisiana would have to come up with the other 25 percent.

At the same time, the City of New Orleans and several other parishes nearby sued 11 oil and gas companies, including Entergy New Orleans, claiming that when those companies dug canals and buried pipelines through the wetlands near the city for their operations, they caused the nearby land to erode and wash away, and the erosion has been exacerbated because the canals haven’t been properly maintained.

  • New Orleans Mayor Latoya Cantrell said, “The land that’s been lost was a protective barrier defending us from hurricanes and floods. If the current trend holds, New Orleans will be a literal coastal city within the next fifty years.”
  • The city’s claims are based on studies from local universities and the Rand Corporation that concluded that coastal land loss could cost the state more than $133 billion in lost capital stock.
  • The Governor of Louisiana encouraged the local governments to file suit in the hope that the oil and gas companies would provide funds to restore the wetlands, which would help to cover the costs of a massive restoration effort to minimize the loss of land in coastal Louisiana.

Why This Matters: The concerns about the levees in New Orleans, and the greater problem of loss of land in coastal Louisiana, have been debated by the public for much of the last five years.  The law that directed the upgrade of the levees mandated that they have to be strong enough to withstand a 100-year storm, and if they are not, the federal government might not guarantee flood insurance to the people who live behind them.  Approximately 2,000 square miles of coastal wetlands have been turned to open water since the 1930s, and land continues to be lost at an estimated rate of a football field every hour. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that at those rates the remaining wetlands protecting the levees could be under water before the end of the century.  So if the oil and gas companies are causing some of this erosion to occur, they ought to pay to restore the wetlands and improve levees.  If they don’t, then taxpayers will have to pick up the cost and it won’t be cheap.

The Mississippi River snaking through coastal Louisiana in 2015  Image: NASA

Up Next

Chile Makes Good On Its Promise of an Azul COP

Chile Makes Good On Its Promise of an Azul COP

One of the major ways that this year’s UN Climate meeting is greatly different from previous ones is its recognition of oceans as a major part of the climate problems (with support from the findings of the IPCC’s recent Oceans and Cryosphere report) and also its solutions. Chile’s Foreign Minister, Teodoro Ribera Neumann explained today that Chile elevated ocean issues because they are integral to both climate change and to his country.

Why This Matters:  The UN climate meetings in the past had failed to take oceans into account when looking at how to address climate change and that, frankly, was a major oversight.

Continue Reading 623 words
Nature-Based Climate Solutions Like #30×30 Gaining Traction With New COP Leaders

Nature-Based Climate Solutions Like #30×30 Gaining Traction With New COP Leaders

Yesterday was #HumanRightsDay and the importance of access to and conserving nature as a basic human right was emphasized repeatedly at the UN Climate Meeting in Madrid — sustaining biodiversity is increasingly recognized for its benefits to addressing the climate emergency. And as developing countries are stepping up to fill the leadership void at the Climate Meeting, their leaders are looking for multifaceted climate solutions that conserve biodiversity and provide for sustainable use of natural resources.

Why This Matters:  It is just this simple — without biodiversity, life on Earth for humans is not possible.  But if we started by protecting or restoring 30 percent of the planet by 2030 for nature itself, that would provide huge carbon capture as well as biodiversity benefits.  

Continue Reading 582 words
U.S. NGOs, Companies and States Moving Forward at UN Meeting, But Feds Are MIA

U.S. NGOs, Companies and States Moving Forward at UN Meeting, But Feds Are MIA

The U.S. government is visibly absent here in Madrid — it does not have a meeting pavilion to showcase the nation’s efforts and to give its government participants a place to convene other governments and stakeholders to show what is happening in the U.S. on climate change.  But the U.S. is still well-represented at the UN Climate Meeting by an army of environmental groups, state and local governments, corporations, and philanthropists.

Why This Matters:  U.S. Stakeholders are putting up a brave front and have not taken their foot off the gas (bad pun) — and, in fact, are working to increase the actionable commitments by U.S. stakeholders.  But being “in” simply is not enough for the U.S., which had led the prior COPs and is the second-largest emitter. 

Continue Reading 547 words