Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
White Pesticide Residue on Citrus Trees in California Photo: Gabriella Demczuk, The New York Times
The New York Times published a major investigation over the holidays explaining the real-life impacts of the Trump Administration’s environmental regulation rollbacks and reversals by telling the stories of agricultural workers in California sickened by looser standards on pesticide use, residents near a coal-fired power plant in Houston who are exposed to increased carbon dioxide pollution, of the contamination of the Kanawha River in West Virginia threatening drinking water supplies and endangering the residents of “Chemical Valley,” and of the dangers caused by the flaring of methane gas from oil wells on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota causing the residents to breathe toxic benzene and other chemicals not to mention the resulting waste of gas.
The Times reporters, Pulitzer-winners Eric Lipton, Steve Eder, and John Branch, reached five major conclusions after examining each rollback’s impact in depth.
The Obama Environmental Legacy Is Quickly Being Erased: Obama carefully developed many environmental rules over the course of his 8 years in office and Trump is ripping them up in short order;
The Entire Nation Is Being Impacted: no region of the country has been spared the impacts of the rollbacks and many communities have been bitterly divided by the rapid actions;
The Rollbacks Are Comprehensive In the Environment: the rule changes have impacted air, water, oceans, land conservation, toxic chemicals, and pesticides;
The Trump Promise to Bring Back Coal is Unfulfilled Despite the Rollbacks: coal consumption is at its lowest point in decades as coal power plants continue to close despite the government’s actions to prop them up; and
Progress and Setbacks Lag Behind Government Action: environmental declines will continue into the future even if the rules are restored because it takes time for all the harms to become apparent.
The bottom line is that the consequences of the President keeping his promise to deregulate in favor of industry and development, particularly for fossil fuels, are beginning to have real detrimental impacts for those who live or work in proximity to them.
Why This Matters: The very people the President claimed to want to help are many of the ones being hurt by the negative health impacts of deregulation. They are seeing few financial benefits and health care costs of these exposures are impacting them directly. But if you don’t live or work in one of these areas, you could be completely unaware — at least for now — of the grave costs of these rollbacks. Telling these stories is a key to making them more visible to a larger swath of the public who mistakenly believe that in the U.S. the environment is well protected.
Carbon dioxide pollution from Parish Power Plant outside Houston Photo: Gabriella Demczuk, The New York Times
To Go Deeper: Worth your time – read the entire NYT series — we highly recommend it. The photos by Gabriella Demczuk are also quite captivating.
And For More:The New York Times published another heartbreaking story about a cancer cluster in a suburb of Indianapolis, where kids are getting sick and dying at an alarming rate, and many residents suspect it is due to long-standing chemical pollution nearby made worse by Trump Administration’s inaction in the face of mounting evidence.
EPA’s acting chief of enforcement sent a memo to staff last week (that The Hill obtained) calling for them to “[s]trengthen enforcement in overburdened communities by resolving environmental noncompliance through remedies with tangible benefits for the community” with a particular emphasis on “cornerstone environmental statutes.”
Why This Matters: The Biden administration can immediately make progress correcting environmental injustice through fair and strong enforcement of current laws
A long battle over the use of a bug-killing pesticide linked to brain damage in children may be coming to an end. In a ruling last week, a federal appeals court gave the Environmental Protection Agency 60 days to ban the pesticide chlorpyrifos, commonly used on oranges, almonds, and other crops — or prove there’s a safe use of the chemical.
Why This Matters: The pesticide industry used the same playbook as with PFAS, tobacco, and oil: raisedoubt about the clear science and prevent immediate action from being taken, to the harm of everyone else.
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer Decades after scientists first discovered the dangerous public health risks of the pesticide DDT, researchers have confirmed that two generations later, it’s impacting the grandchildren of women exposed in the 1950s and 60s. Those exposed to DDT before it was banned first-hand saw increased rates of breast cancer; subsequently, their children experienced higher […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.