Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
The New York Times reported on a new study published last week that found that older people are “significant contributors” to climate change because energy consumption increases with a person’s age, but also have experienced observable climate changes in their lifetimes. Meanwhile, The Washington Post found that many state and local politicians are putting the Green New Deal (GND) label on their own proposals to halt the climate crisis because the GND is so popular with young voters, even though the Sunrise Movement (the youth organization whose protests sparked the proposal) often pushes back on these proposals saying they don’t go far enough.
Why This Matters:These two news reports, in a nutshell, encapsulate the climate change generation gap. Older people have been the cause of greenhouse gas emissions that resulted in the climate crisis. They are also continuing to add to the problem because of their increasing energy use. The confluence of an aging population and an increasingly warm climate will likely expand the scope of the impacts, challenging the supply and demand of energy for the older population. And as the inheritors of the problem, young people are anxious for the sweeping changes represented by a so-called Green New Deal, even if the policies behind the label are not the most extreme versions of the GND proposal. Meanwhile, older Democrats are less enthusiastically behind any proposal labeled as a GND, even though they are the ones who can be the most certain that climate change is real and already happening because they have lived long enough to witness the changes themselves.
The Fuzzy GND: Meanwhile, legislators seem somewhat comfortable with a more moderate and less defined set of policy ideas and proposals in order to ensure they appeal to a wide swath of the Democratic Party. The Post cites the fact that the energy committee of the AFL-CIO “lambasted” Ocasio-Cortez’s GND proposal as “not achievable or realistic.” But in Maine, state legislators behind the GND there have sought the buy-in of labor unions early when drafting their own respective plans and proposals on the climate change.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer China is often criticized for funding fossil fuel power infrastructure beyond its borders, and rightly so: it’s the top financier of overseas power plants, especially coal-fired ones. But they’re not the only ones continuing to finance coal and gas projects overseas. The US and Japan are a close second […]
This past May, President Biden signed an executive order on climate-related financial risk, a cross-governmental plan that directs federal agencies to identify and mitigate financial risks presented by climate change to Americans, businesses, and the government itself. Progress on this order was made over the weekend when Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced that the Financial Stability […]
Why This Matters: Money talks. Investors are increasingly willing to walk away from deals like oil and gas drilling projects in the Arctic or investments in fossil fuel companies that refuse to change their business models.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.