Pipeline Court Challenges Continue

Enefit American Oil Project Location

On Tuesday, five environmental groups announced their intention to sue the Trump Administration over its decision to allow the Enefit project to go forward and begin constructing three pipelines and two transmission lines across federal land in Utah — these will transport processed oil from a large shale facility to various utilities.  The Hill reported that the groups are challenging the development because it would drain billions of gallons of water from the Green River in Colorado, threaten endangered wildlife, and result in significant greenhouse gas emissions as well.   The Center For Biological Diversity stated that the lawsuit alleges:

  • the water pipeline would “enable removal of up to 10,867 acre-feet per year of water from the Green River” for use at the oil shale facility;
  • would severely harm four endangered Upper Colorado River fish species and their critical habitat; and
  • the shale facility would produce 547 million barrels of oil over three decades, spewing more than 200 million tons of greenhouse gas — as much as 50 coal-fired power plants produce in a year.

“The water resources of the Colorado River Basin are already headed toward an irretrievable decline in both quantity and quality,” said John Weisheit with Living Rivers Colorado Riverkeeper. “Opposing the Enefit Project is a no brainer; it epitomizes exactly what inappropriate development looks like.”

Meanwhile, back east, Dominion Energy lost again in federal court over its troubled 600 mile-long Atlantic Pipeline that would transport fracked natural gas from West Virginia, through Virginia and North Carolina.   A federal appeals court ruled last December that the Forest Service could not authorize the pipeline to cross the Old Appalachian trail and had “abdicated its responsibility to preserve national forest resources” when it approved the pipeline passing through the George Washington and Monongahela National Forests. Dominion had asked for a rehearing of its case, but the appeals court refused.  Dominion announced it will now appeal to the Supreme Court and pursue other legislative and administrative options as well.  

Why This Matters:  Environmental groups are having success slowing down the development of highly destructive pipelines that support troubling fracking projects. There are strong grounds for their challenges based on the environmental laws as well as the slipshod decision-making by the Trump Administration. The Appalachian Trail, the Green River, The George Washington National Forest, and Dinosaur National Monument are too precious to be trashed.  There are better ways to generate the power we need in this country, and it makes no sense to risk these national treasures in order to develop oil and gas infrastructure for a fossil fuel export market when globally the long term trend is toward renewable energy.  

Atlantic Pipeline Project Graphic: Appalachian Voices

Up Next

Internet + Solar = The Perfect Match

Internet + Solar = The Perfect Match

by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer In the United States, there’s a growing need to scale up high-speed broadband and clean energy infrastructure. A new housing initiative in New York City will take on both with a single project: setting buildings up for solar power, then using the energy cost savings to bring high-speed internet […]

Continue Reading 348 words
Poland Sets Date to Close Europe’s Dirtiest Power Plant

Poland Sets Date to Close Europe’s Dirtiest Power Plant

By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer This week, Poland announced it will close the coal-fired Belchatow power plant by the end of 2036. The country’s national energy group opted not to develop an open-pit coal mine to power the plant after deciding it would not make financial sense. The decision comes as Poland’s Lodz region […]

Continue Reading 563 words
More than 1000 Protesters Disrupt “Line 3” Pipeline Construction in Minnesota

More than 1000 Protesters Disrupt “Line 3” Pipeline Construction in Minnesota

Thousands of protesters gathered near the headwaters of the Mississippi River from around the country, including actresses Jane Fonda and Patricia Arquette, in an attempt to disrupt the construction of a major pipeline through northern Minnesota, the Duluth Tribune reported.

Why This Matters: The Line 3 pipeline, at a cost of $4B, will carry hundreds of thousands of barrels of dirty Canadian tar-sands oil through the U.S. across at least 200 bodies of water and sensitive watersheds.

Continue Reading 512 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.