Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
On Tuesday, five environmental groups announced their intention to sue the Trump Administration over its decision to allow the Enefit project to go forward and begin constructing three pipelines and two transmission lines across federal land in Utah — these will transport processed oil from a large shale facility to various utilities. The Hill reported that the groups are challenging the development because it would drain billions of gallons of water from the Green River in Colorado, threaten endangered wildlife, and result in significant greenhouse gas emissions as well. The Center For Biological Diversity stated that the lawsuit alleges:
the water pipeline would “enable removal of up to 10,867 acre-feet per year of water from the Green River” for use at the oil shale facility;
would severely harm four endangered Upper Colorado River fish species and their critical habitat; and
the shale facility would produce 547 million barrels of oil over three decades, spewing more than 200 million tons of greenhouse gas — as much as 50 coal-fired power plants produce in a year.
“The water resources of the Colorado River Basin are already headed toward an irretrievable decline in both quantity and quality,” said John Weisheit with Living Rivers Colorado Riverkeeper. “Opposing the Enefit Project is a no brainer; it epitomizes exactly what inappropriate development looks like.”
Meanwhile, back east, Dominion Energy lost again in federal court over its troubled 600 mile-long Atlantic Pipeline that would transport fracked natural gas from West Virginia, through Virginia and North Carolina. A federal appeals court ruled last December that the Forest Service could not authorize the pipeline to cross the Old Appalachian trail and had “abdicated its responsibility to preserve national forest resources” when it approved the pipeline passing through the George Washington and Monongahela National Forests. Dominion had asked for a rehearing of its case, but the appeals court refused. Dominion announced it will now appeal to the Supreme Court and pursue other legislative and administrative options as well.
Why This Matters: Environmental groups are having success slowing down the development of highly destructive pipelines that support troubling fracking projects. There are strong grounds for their challenges based on the environmental laws as well as the slipshod decision-making by the Trump Administration. The Appalachian Trail, the Green River, The George Washington National Forest, and Dinosaur National Monument are too precious to be trashed. There are better ways to generate the power we need in this country, and it makes no sense to risk these national treasures in order to develop oil and gas infrastructure for a fossil fuel export market when globally the long term trend is toward renewable energy.
Investment in electric vehicles and their components and infrastructure continue to grow in spite of the pandemic and economic downturn, not to mention the infancy of the market.According to MarketWatch.com, there is “sky high” investor interest in clean energy and electric vehicle companies.
President Trump trumpeted his trade deal with China, but so far it has been a bust, according to The Wall Street Journal — the Chinese have not purchased nearly the amount of energy (in terms of total dollars) as they promised — only $2B in oil and gas purchases against a commitment of $25B for this year.
A federal judge in Washington, DC ruled yesterday that the Dakota Access Pipeline must shut down and empty all its oil until the government completes an environmental review of the pipeline’s impacts, giving the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, whose reservation lies downstream, a huge victory. Similarly, late in the day, the Supreme Court refused to overturn the order of a district judge that shut down construction of parts of the Keystone XL pipeline so it is also blocked for now.
Why It Matters: The Dakota and Keystone XL news is greatly tempered by the fact that numerous other pipeline projects can go ahead despite their inadequate permit unless they are individually challenged in court and blocked.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.