Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Photo: Florian Schulz, National Geographic
Last week, the Interior Department held a public meeting in Fairbanks to hear their comments and concerns about plans to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling. The agency brought scientists who were there to explain the environmental impact of the project and then take testimony from members of the public. Opponents of drilling took over the meeting and used it to air grievances about the public comment process and the lack of consultation with Alaska Natives during the drafting process for the environmental impact statement or “EIS” which is intended to describe the harm to the environment that will be caused by drilling projects.
The attendees protested the fact that the draft document was not translated into their Native American language, the last minute scheduling of the meetings (there were only five days of notice) because of the issue of the language divide was brought up by Adrienne Blatchford, an Inupiaq woman originally from Unalakleet who now lives in Fairbanks, as well as subsistence hunting concerns and climate change.
At the same time, a bi-partisan group of Members of Congress yesterday introduced a bill that would ban oil and natural gas drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and repeal a section of the 2017 GOP tax-cut law that, for the first time, opened part of the refuge for drilling.
Why This Matters:While the drilling in ANWR will still be challenged in court, it is important for the public to let their views be heard, particularly in public meetings that are covered by the local press in Alaska. The Interior Department leadership believes that a majority of Alaskans support drilling in Alaska, but these resources belong to ALL Americans and they do not support it. The Hill reported that Congressman Alan Lowenthal stated, “This is a deeply unpopular thing in the United States. People don’t want it. They haven’t asked for it,” he said. “And they will not accept that the wildest place in our country is on track to be sacrificed at the altar of Big Oil.” Well said.
What You Can Do:Public comments on the proposal to drill can be submitted through March 13 on line at www.blm.gov/alaska/Coastal-Plain-EIS or you can mail comments to Attn: Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program EIS, 222 West Seventh Ave., Stop #13, Anchorage, AK 99513. Several more public meets are planned for locations across the state this month, including one in Washington, D.C. at the National Housing Center tomorrow.
Approximately 2.1 million acres of intact grassland habitat in the U.S. and Canadian Great Plains were plowed under for row-crop production in 2018, according to World Wildlife Fund’s (WWF) 2020 Plowprint Report. This means that from 2014-2018, tillage of grasslands across the Great Plains occurred at an average rate of four football fields every minute. […]
By Sherri Goodman and Leah Emanuel On June 26, President Trump issued an executive order demanding the prosecution of “anarchists and left-wing extremists” destroying and defacing American monuments. Asserting that it is the role of the Federal Government to protect federal monuments, memorials, statues, and property to their fullest extent, the order proclaims that Federal, […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.