Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
A legislator in Connecticut in January introduced a bill requiring schools to teach climate change science starting at the elementary level. Connecticut already has a science curriculum “standard” that encourages the teaching of climate science, but if it passes, this law would be the first in the country to mandate it, according to The Associated Press (AP).
State Representative Christine Palm, who proposed the bill, told the AP, “I think it should be mandatory, and I think it should be early so there’s no excuse for kids to grow up ignorant of what’s at stake.”
But others argue the law is not needed because Connecticut already adopted the “Next Generation Science Standards,” which include climate change as part of the core science education curriculum beginning in middle school.
Nineteen states and the District of Columbia so far have adopted the Next Generation Science Standards, but generally, state legislatures stop short of curriculum mandates.
Palm believes it is essential that climate is taught to students, saying, “I’d love to see poetry be mandated. That’s never going to happen,” she said. “That’s not life or death.”
Why This Matters: Mandating in law that certain subjects be taught is a tricky precedent to set. It is not hard to imagine a backlash of laws being passed in “redder” states prohibiting the teaching of climate science in response. This feels a bit like the debate over teaching evolution in schools. And yet, without the knowledge about the greatest challenge their generation will likely face, it seems like we are not preparing children well to deal with the impacts of climate change that surely lie ahead. Goals and standards may not be enough in this case, and given the scientific consensus around climate change, this does not seem like a terribly radical proposal, and it will be interesting to see what happens with the Connecticut bill. Last year the same bill failed.
To Go Deeper: We highly recommend this incredible series by The Washington Post’s Zoeann Murphy and Chris Mooney called “Gone in a Generation” about how the impacts of climate change are already disrupting lives across America. It looks at climate change through the lenses of forests, floods, fires and fisheries. It is excellent.
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer One of the big headlines out of the European Union’s recently released package of concrete policies to hit climate neutrality was the phase out of diesel and petrol fueled cars by 2035. The proposal plans for charging stations every 60km (about every 37 miles), a massive ramp up in […]
High heels, wigs, and full makeup may not be the attire traditionally associated with hiking in the great outdoors, yet environmentalist drag queen Pattie Gonia is using her photoshoots to bring awareness to environmental issues and make the outdoors more inclusive for all groups. As Yale Climate Connections wrote, Pattie Gonia says it starts by […]
by Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer A new study found that men’s consumer spending causes 16% more emissions than that of women when spending similar sums of money on goods. The study juxtaposed the spending habits of single men and women in Sweden, and found that men were more likely to spend on fuel for […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.