Trump Administration Orders Manipulation of Climate Science

The New York Times reported yesterday that in addition to significantly weakening Obama Administration policies and rules that would have cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, now the Trump Administration is working to “recalculate” the risks posed by climate change by ordering scientists to ignore long term impacts beyond 2040 and to omit analysis of the worst-case scenarios in the next national climate assessment report.

Why This Matters:  Here we go again.  The George W. Bush Administration also tried to squelch the science around climate change — their tactic was to have politicians redraft the scientific conclusions and to put greater emphasis on analysis of uncertainties surrounding climate science at the time. They were unable to succeed because government scientists were able to point to their results and vouch for them — they could object on the merits. The Trump Administration’s plan is more dangerous because by not performing these analyses the ability of outsiders and the government’s own scientists to critique the government’s actions will be diminished.  We won’t know what we don’t know.  And what we don’t know can and will hurt us.  

What This Will Mean For Climate Science:  This will lead to incomplete data and analysis on which to base government decisions and plans.

  • Scientists claim that this will warp the picture of the business as usual scenario because the worst impacts of climate change do not begin until after 2050.
  • Until now, scientists have used computer models to analyze several different scenarios through the end of the century including as much as an 8-degree temperature rise.
  • “Nobody in the world does climate science like that,” said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton. “It would be like designing cars without seatbelts or airbags.”

The Climate Change Strippers:  The list of Trump political appointees who have stripped climate change information from official documents is growing.

  • The Times reported that the “White House-appointed director of the United States Geological Survey, James Reilly, a former astronaut and petroleum geologist, has ordered that scientific assessments produced by that office use only computer-generated climate models that project the impact of climate change through 2040 rather than through the end of the century.”
  • In addition to Secretary of State Pompeo, another prominent climate denier is National Security Advisor John Bolton who officials say instructed them to strip references to global warming from speeches and other formal statements.

Some Agencies Are Resisting:  Not all government science agencies are planning such changes. A spokesman for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, asked if its scientists would limit the use of climate models, wrote in an email, “No changes are being considered at this time.”

Up Next

The Link Between Climate Change and Biodiversity

The Link Between Climate Change and Biodiversity

Climate change has emerged as a leading cause of biodiversity loss. As Scientific American noted, it will be the fastest-growing cause of species loss in the Americas by midcentury and in Africa it could cause some animals to decline by as much as 50 percent by the end of the century, and up to 90 […]

Continue Reading 421 words
Venice Floods Again — What to Do When You Can’t Move to Higher Ground?

Venice Floods Again — What to Do When You Can’t Move to Higher Ground?

The historic city of Venice (a UNESCO world heritage site) flooded for the third time in a week, with Piazza St. Mark closed to tourists again on Sunday, and in Pisa and Florence torrential rains threaten to flood there too as the President of the region warned of a “flood wave” on the Arno that threads through both cities. 

Why This Matters:  Venice is a world treasure — it’s a city that floods with millions of tourists each year and is home to about 50,000 residents who depend on them. Its future is very much in doubt given the repeated and devastating floods — its residents are beginning to believe they are fighting a losing battle.

Continue Reading 531 words
We Need To Expand the National Weather Service To Provide More Climate Services

We Need To Expand the National Weather Service To Provide More Climate Services

By Monica Medina, Founder and CEO of Our Daily Planet Earlier this year, I drafted a chapter for a book of “big” new environmental ideas entitled “A Better Planet: Forty Big Ideas for a Sustainable Future.”  In my essay, I propose that in order to brace ourselves for the impacts of climate change that we […]

Continue Reading 1006 words