Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Wait, are we done with the debate on climate change already? What did I miss? I had just gone to the fridge to get my Diet Dr. Pepper and. when I came back.. okay, I guess so much for the greatest existential threat to the planet
As we mentioned previously, we’ll include an analysis of the Democratic debates tomorrow and will feature a Bright Ideas on the topic as well on Saturday but we couldn’t help but share this tweet from veteran news anchor Dan Rather about last night’s debates. He summed up our feelings regarding the negligible attention placed on climate change last night with a lot of charm. Anyone else have a sudden craving for Diet Dr. Pepper?
Why This Matters: Dan Rather is a lifelong journalist, not a partisan, so for him to tweet this out shows that the media’s coverage of climate issues and how to talk about them when they are covered has a lot of room for improvement. Although Rather is off the air and doesn’t have a producer reminding him that climate change is a “ratings killer,” we should take his tweet to heart and really evaluate why on-air journalists stumble with the issue of climate so much. Moderators Chuck Todd and Rachel Maddow of MSNBC didn’t ask the candidates point blank about how they would handle the threat of climate change, instead, they opted for convoluted questions that lead to convoluted answers. Here’s hoping they get it right for tonight’s debate!
Yesterday at the annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged to achieve “carbon neutrality before 2060” with the aim of hitting peak emissions before 2030. China had choice words for the Trump administration and its complete lack of international leadership on climate change action. Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang […]
The world’s richest one percent cause more than double the CO2 of the poorest 50% according to a new study from Oxfam. From 1990 to 2015, CO2 emissions rose by 60%; experts saw the wealthiest one percent’s emissions rise three times more than those of the poorest half during that period.
Why this matters: While the wealthiest indulge in luxuries that contribute more to climate change, a federal report found that the poor will be among the earliest victims of climate crises and will be impacted the most.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.